RtF's Latest Articles:
- Saturday Night Assault Specials
- A Real Standup Guy
- Jury Rights Day ~ September 5
- Americans, the Common Law, and Freedom – What you need to know.
- The Minimum Wage Terror
- When Power Speaks Truth
|
Good ReadsRtF's Latest DiggsRational ReviewPopular content |
Ron Paul and Davy Crockett, by Paul4PrezSubmitted by Staff on Wed, 2007-09-12 14:36.Ron Paul's strict adherence to the Constitution has led to some individual votes where he is the lone voice in opposition. He voted against giving a Congressional medal to Ronald Reagan, despite being a longtime friend and supporter, and against similar medals for other deserving figures. Whenever such a request comes up, Dr. Paul offers to contribute one hundred dollars of his own money, if the other Congressmen will do the same. Invariably, his offer is refused, and taxpayer funds are used instead. Ron Paul contends that Congress has no Constitutional authority to grant medals of that type, since it is not among their enumerated powers, and that if they truly wish to honor those individuals they should do so with their own money. As he says, "It is, of course, very easy to be generous with the people's money." Ron Paul reminds us that under the Constitution, the "government exists to protect liberty, not to redistribute wealth or to grant special privileges." His view may be all too rare in Congress, but it was shared by another famous Congressman in our past, Davy Crockett. Before his heroic death at the Alamo, Davy Crockett was a legendary frontiersman in Tennessee, and his fame led to his election to Congress in 1826. Like Ron Paul, he was noted for voting his conscience, and not the party line, as evidenced by this quote:
It was Davy Crockett's adherence to the Constitutional limits of government that led to one of his most famous speeches, "Not Yours to Give." Congress was considering a bill to provide financial assistance to the widow of a distinguished naval officer. The bill was headed for easy passage, until Colonel Crockett voiced his objections.
Congressmen in the 1820's apparently had a clearer understanding of the Constitution than those today, and the measure was defeated following Crockett's speech. They weren't entirely different from the politicians we know from our day, however, as Davy Crockett explained to his supporters back home:
Like Ron Paul, Congressman Crockett occasionally faced opposition from the leaders of his own party for his independent streak and his adherence to the Constitution. During his second term, he opposed President Jackson's Indian Removal Act, leading to his defeat in seeking a third term. He was reelected later, before being defeated once again. He explained that he hadn't abandoned his principles, the party had.
Two more Crockett quotes form a more fitting conclusion to this comparison to Ron Paul:
Reply |
Recent comments
1 day 12 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 20 hours ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 5 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago