In Paul's mythology, everything from the NAFTA Superhighway to the International Criminal Court is a threat to US "national sovereignty." But let a foreign power attempt to dictate whether or not the US government will acknowledge indisputable historical fact, and it suddenly becomes "interventionism" to resist.

Whodathunk?

----
[Tom's editorial note on Rational Review(10/23): "I expected Paul to come out against allowing a foreign power to control whether or not the US acknowledges indisputable historical facts. So much for any consistency on the issue of 'national sovereignty' – TLK" Added by me as I wanted to comment on both. – MJ]