... instead of just blurbing Neil's article. I'm interested in why you think that I in particular am "starting feud and division."

The article Neil responded to was very specific in OPPOSING "starting feud and division" by demanding that an organization break its own bylaws "NOW NOW NOW" in order to do something that it's perfectly capable of AMENDING those bylaws to do next May.

When the Ron Paul campaign ends -- whether that's on February 6th or next November -- I expect to continue working with my fellow libertarians who supported that campaign. While I'm not big on the word "fair" -- it usually comes off as whiny -- I'll use it this time:

It's not "fair" to accuse me of "starting feud and division" versus people who screech that anyone who doesn't support their candidate of the moment, and join them in tearing down any libertarian institution that might conceivably stand in the way of that candidate's unlikely success, "is not a libertarian" ... especially since I've probably done more to promote Ron Paul as a side effect of my regular work than most of the activists who promote him intentionally.

Best regards,
Tom Knapp