Is there also an inequity WITH honour?

What you miss is the fact that the system rests on fiat money, which relies on statism. Moreover, the egalitarian world you seem to espouse would also rely on statism. Your agenda seems to lead to Collectivism, just another dictatorial world.

My article did not attempt to deal with the entire problem, just one of the core foundation issues, the need for an objective money for us to be free. It should be clear that freedom requires an entirely different government than the one we have (in almost every country in the world).

Establishing an objective monetary system needs to be coupled with an objective system of justice. It requires a separation of government and the economy, enabling us to achieve full economic growth, not redistributing our earned wealth so that all have an equal share.

I agree that the complete picture of what needs to be done must include ending dynastic rule, racism, psychotic control, nepotism in government, and other evils. Statism is behind all of that. See http://aynrandlexicon.org/lexicon/statism.html for more about statism. The alternative is a legitimate government that only provides the services of police, courts and national defense. I have written other articles about those topics, and chose to add this article because of the current monetary fiasco that illegitimate government has foisted upon us. It would not have been possible if money was gold.

Establishing a pure gold money system is part of what is needed.