George W. Bush is not a douche bag!

I have been known to visit websites that are frequented by, shall we say, somewhat less-than-politically-correct commentators. A rash of recent comments have stated, "George W. Bush is a douche bag".

I disagree.

When used for it's intended purpose, a douche bag is a useful item- one that renders previously contaminated areas clean and fresh. I seriously doubt even the most ardent supporter would be able to say any area that has come into contact with Bush and his administration is cleaner or in better condition than before.

I think calling him a douche bag does a grave disservice to an otherwise humble yet effective device.

Therefore, I propose the following terms/devices be used to describe King George:

Testostazine Male enhancer

Closed cycle mill 17th century device

Edsel Automotive disaster

Darwin awards contestant "Hey, watch this!"

Hopefully, this will help dissuade folks from disparaging perfectly good products by associating them with one of the most unsuitable, inaccessible, unattainable, unavailable, unreachable; brain-dead, dormant, fallow, idle, inactive, inert, inoperative, and all around generally short-bus-material, that has ever (dis)graced 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.